Abstract
Philip Morris and other tobacco companies have been using ammonia in their manufacturing for more than half a century, and for a variety of purposes: to highlight certain flavors, to expand or “puff up” the volume of tobacco, to prepare reconstituted tobacco sheet (“recon”), to denicotinize (reduce the amount of nicotine in) tobacco, and to remove carcinogens.
By the early 1960s, however, Philip Morris had also begun using ammonia to “freebase” the nicotine in cigarette smoke, creating low-yield (reduced-tar or -nicotine) cigarettes that still had the nicotine kick necessary to keep customers “satisfied” (i.e., addicted). We show that Philip Morris discovered the virtues of freebasing while analyzing the impact of the ammoniated recon used in Marlboro cigarettes.
We also show how Marlboro’s commercial success catalyzed efforts by the rest of the tobacco industry to discover its “secret,” eventually identified as ammonia technology, and how Philip Morris later exploited the myriad uses of ammonia (e.g., for flavoring and expanding tobacco volume) to defend itself against charges of manipulating the nicotine deliveries of its cigarettes.
AMMONIA OCCURS NATURALLY in cured tobacco leaf, from close to 0% in some varieties up to about 1% (by weight) in the leaves used in some higher-quality cigars.1 The compound is also commonly used as a tobacco additive, either in its native form as a clear, pungent gas (NH3, an ingredient in smelling salts) or as an aqueous or solid ammonium salt (NH4+). Although toxic in large doses, ammonia is relatively easy to remove from processed tobacco leaves; the gaseous form is quite volatile, and the salt is easily neutralized by the addition of an acid.2 The tobacco industry has for many years used ammonia as a relatively innocuous additive to augment certain flavors, to economize on costs by expanding or “puffing” the cured leaf, to denicotinize (reduce the amount of nicotine in) tobacco, and even to reduce some of the carcinogens in tobacco smoke.
By the early 1960s, however, Philip Morris scientists had discovered that ammonia could also be used to increase the free nicotine in cigarette smoke, providing a more powerful nicotine kick than the milder low-pH tobaccos traditionally used in American-blend cigarettes. The discovery seems to have come about by accident, in the course of exploring the properties of the ammoniated tobaccos used in the preparation of reconstituted tobacco sheet (“recon”).
This freebased version of Marlboro cigarettes was one of the greatest triumphs in the history of modern drug design and one reason the brand became the world’s most popular cigarette. Yet to this day, Philip Morris denies it has ever deliberately freebased tobacco to boost nicotine yields. The company recalls only the many innocuous uses of ammonia—as a “flavorant” or binder required for the manufacture of recon, for example. The industry reminds us that ammonia is naturally found in foods, fertilizers, and the very air we breathe.
We have analyzed internal documents of the tobacco industry to show that Philip Morris discovered ammonia’s freebasing ability while attempting to understand the impact of the ammoniated tobacco sheet used in its Marlboro cigarettes. The archival record shows that ammonia technology eventually spread throughout the industry, but only after diligent efforts to reverse engineer the chemistry of Marlboros to discover their “secret.” Philip Morris later exploited the alternate uses of ammonia—in flavoring, expanding, reconstituting, and denicotinizing tobacco—to defend itself against charges of having manipulated the nicotine in cigarettes. The tobacco industry is notorious for having manipulated science; it is now in the process of renarrating the history of science to defend itself against charges of having deliberately taken paths that led to massive death and disease.
THE OMNIPRESENT ADDITIVE
Ammonia’s capacity to improve tobacco smoke flavor has been recognized at least since the early 1950s, when Claude E. Teague Jr, an RJ Reynolds chemist who later became the company’s director of research, found that ammonia gave smoke a richer, smoother, “chocolate-like” taste reminiscent of a burley blend, the most alkaline of the common varieties of tobacco leaf.4 Philip Morris scientists also recognized this relationship between alkalinity and burley’s rich taste, and in the late 1950s and early 1960s began using a range of bases, including ammonia, diammonium phosphate (DAP), and various ethanolamines and carbonates to “improve smoke flavor.”5
In these early years, tobacco manufacturers were not sure why ammonia—most often regarded as an irritant—improved the taste of tobacco smoke. They eventually came to understand that there was a threshold level beyond which further additions of the compound would no longer improve flavor. In 1971, Philip Morris experimented on competitors’ brands and found that ammonia added at 0.25% concentration created a taste that was “milder, more aromatic, sweeter, less harsh, and more like a Marlboro,” whereas ammonia added at 0.50% concentration created an “off taste.”6 RJ Reynolds scientists later hypothesized that ammonia might improve tobacco smoke flavor by reacting with sugars to produce heterocyclic ring compounds known as pyrazines. Because pyrazines were already known for their vibrant flavors, RJ Reynolds scientists hypothesized (in documents marked “secret”) that amino-sugars such as pyrazines might be the key to ammonia’s ability to improve tobacco.7
Ammonia has also been used in a number of cost-saving processes, including the production of expanded or “puffed” tobacco. Increasing tobacco’s volume was a priority in the 1970s, when tobacco companies first recognized that expanding a given volume of tobacco could increase its “filling power,” thereby reducing the mass of leaf required to fill a cigarette of some fixed length and circumference. The reduced mass of tobacco per cigarette encouraged customers to smoke more to get their desired amount of “satisfaction,” the industry’s euphemism for nicotine.
There are a number of ways to expand tobacco. The most common today is the dry ice expanded tobacco (DIET) process, which uses carbon dioxide (CO2) in solid form to freeze-dry and “puff up” the tobacco. In 1973, however, Philip Morris patented a puffing procedure that used ammonia in conjunction with CO2. The cured leaf was treated with dry ice and ammonia—in liquid or gaseous form, as a hydroxide with CO2 or as a carbonate or bicarbonate—followed by applications of heat.8 This method was soon discontinued in favor of the DIET process,9 apparently because of cost concerns. According to confidential Philip Morris records, it took 143 pounds of ammonia to make 2000 pounds of expanded tobacco10; dry-ice methods, by contrast, were relatively cheap.
Reconstituted tobacco has been a more enduring use of ammonia. Essentially a paper-making process, recon was developed in the 1930s and 1940s as part of an effort to salvage more of the tobacco leaf, including the stems or mid-ribs formerly thrown away as waste. To make these waste parts smokable, however, and to increase sheet strength, required the addition of a substance “to release the pectins in tobacco stems so they may form a gel which becomes the binder in the blended leaf sheet.”11 In the 1950s Philip Morris had begun exploring the use of diammonium phosphate (DAP) in recon and found it to be a successful pectin releaser and a potent flavor enhancer, masking the unpleasant taste of stem.12 The company set up its first pilot plant for ammoniating tobacco (with DAP) in 1961, and 6 years later patented the “diammonium phosphate–blended leaf” (DAP-BL) process after realizing diammonium phosphate’s ability to increase free nicotine “delivery” in cigarettes.13 The patent, interestingly, contains nothing about DAP’s ability to freebase nicotine, citing only its importance as a pectin releaser.14
The tobacco industry also uses ammonia to remove nicotine from tobacco. The procedure is simple: Tobacco leaves are exposed to gaseous ammonia, which replaces nicotine in the salts that bind the alkaloid to the leaf. The ammonia and resulting nicotine are then removed by steam. This method of nicotine reduction gives tobacco manufacturers a degree of control over the amount of nicotine in a given tobacco blend.15
CANCER PREVENTION?
In the 1990s, Philip Morris and the other tobacco companies often mentioned these relatively innocuous uses of ammonia—in flavoring, expanding, and denicotinizing tobacco and in making reconstituted tobacco sheet—when defending themselves against charges of having used ammonia to freebase tobacco. Essentially, their argument was, how could we have done something insidious and underhanded with a molecule like ammonia that is so commonplace, public, and patented for use in so many different kinds of manufacturing processes?16 Typical was a February 24, 1998, letter to the New York Times from Philip Morris’s director of external relations that claimed that the company’s use of ammonia in cigarette manufacturing “does not increase the amount of nicotine delivered to the smoker, does not increase the amount of nicotine absorbed in the lungs of the smoker, and does not affect the form of nicotine delivered to the smoker’s brain.”17 The company was responding to a New York Times exposé on the industry’s widespread use of ammonia technology.18
Prior even to the discovery of ammonia’s ability to increase nicotine availability, however, tobacco companies were using the reagent in confidential experiments to reduce carcinogens in cigarettes. Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, industry scientists were researching the idea that certain ammonium salts, such as ammonium sulfamate and ammonium chloride, could reduce the levels of benzpyrene,19 one of the forty carcinogens in cigarette smoke named by Helmut Wakeham, Philip Morris’s director of research and development, in 1961.20 This research on reducing benzpyrene was part of Philip Morris’s Project 0107, the purpose of which was to develop cigarettes with “less tendency to cause lung cancer in smokers.”21 The Celanese Corporation in 1964 patented a tobacco substitute “in which ammonia salts are used to inhibit benz-a-pyrene formation,”22 and in 1967 British American Tobacco researchers reported similar reductions with potassium carbonate.23
THE “SECRET” (AND SOUL) OF MARLBORO
Marlboro began in the 1920s as a women’s cigarette. Advertisements called it “mild as May,” and it was taken off the market during World War II because of a sales slump. In the mid-1950s, however, with growing public concerns about the link between smoking and lung cancer, Philip Morris decided to reintroduce the brand with a new and improved filter, a flip-top box, and a new masculine image.24 This new version of Marlboro sold surprisingly well, and for an unanticipated reason.
Philip Morris researchers discovered that the reconstituted tobacco they were using to cut costs—the DAP-BL—had some fortunate side effects. Diammonium phosphate, which breaks down into ammonia when a cigarette is burned, improved the flavor of the smoke, giving it that smooth, “chocolate-like” taste, while also increasing the availability of nicotine in the smoke.25 Soon thereafter Philip Morris began using diammonium phosphate and other forms of ammonia in its other cigarettes, including its health-conscious (low-tar) Merit brand. Merits were introduced in 1976 and within 3 years accounted for about 20% of Philip Morris’s cigarette sales.26
How, though, did diammonium phosphate freebase the nicotine in cigarettes? Freebasing entered public consciousness in the mid-1980s, when a cheaper street version of cocaine known as “crack” came on the scene. In point of fact, however, a kind of folk free-basing has been widely used in different parts of the world for many centuries. Archaeologists have found evidence of the use of lime or wood ash to freebase botanicals such as pituri (Duboisia hopwoodii), a nicotine-containing plant used by Australian aborigines to help them endure the harsh desert climate. Folk freebasing can also be found among traditional chewers of coca leaves, betel nuts, and tobacco.
The chemistry of freebasing is not complex. A base, such as ammonia, accepts a proton from a positively charged nicotine carboxylic acid salt (e.g., a malate or a tartrate) found in tobacco. The ammonia (NH3) is thereby transformed into a cation (NH4+), and the positively charged nicotine acid salt is deprotonated to become neutral. This neutral, deprotonated nicotine is “free” in that it is no longer bound to another molecule (or anion) in the form of a salt. Free nicotine is more volatile; James F. Pankow, of Oregon Health and Science University, stresses that “increasing the proportion of the particle-phase nicotine that is in the freebase form will . . . tend to drive more nicotine into the gas phase.”29 Gas-phase nicotine is able to deposit quickly and easily in the respiratory tract and, because of its free-base form, crosses the blood–brain barrier more readily (“moves easily into fatty tissues”30), making the nicotine more “available” to the smoker and therefore more potent.
Ammoniation increases nicotine’s volatility. There is not universal agreement on whether ammoniation also increases the rate of nicotine delivery, but freebasing is widely thought to increase the impact of nicotine by increasing its efficiency of extraction during the smoking process.31 Many tobacco industry documents mention augmentation of nicotine impact, and many of those also reveal a conviction that ammoniation was increasing the rate of nicotine delivery, causing a more immediate and profound “kick” to a smoker’s central nervous system (Figure 1 ▶). Philip Morris admitted the increased rate of nicotine delivery in a 1989 interoffice memo, noting that “the CNS [central nervous system] effects obtained using the NC [nicotine citrate] cigarettes were approximately half the magnitude of those obtained with FB [freebase nicotine] and unextracted cigarettes.”33
The chemistry of freebasing. The tobacco industry has long appreciated the importance of smoke pH for boosting nicotine’s impact. This page, from a 1973 report by Claude E. Teague Jr of RJ Reynolds (Implications and Activities Arising From Correlation of Smoke pH With Nicotine Impact), shows how the freebase form of nicotine in smoke increases with increasing alkalinity. Although pH is a good indicator of relative freebase availability, it tends to underestimate the actual amount available. Other industry methods for measuring free nicotine—such as oil versus water partitioning or studies of nicotine volatility—reveal free nicotine levels much higher than those predicted from pH alone.
Many different terms have been used within the tobacco industry to describe this augmented impact, including volatile nicotine, pH effect, amelioration, extractable nicotine, burley impact, and increased satisfaction or augmentation.34 Channing Robertson, a Stanford chemical engineer, was barred from using the term freebase nicotine in his 1998 testimony for the plaintiffs in Minnesota v. Philip Morris, so he testified instead about what he called “crack nicotine.”35 Crucial for the tobacco industry, however, was that this augmented “kick” provided by ammoniation could offset declining levels of tar and nicotine in cigarettes, which fell by more than half from the 1950s through the 1980s as the industry sought to reassure worried smokers. Freebasing meant you could maintain a high nicotine impact while lowering reported tar and nicotine levels. As one 1971 Liggett document states, “there could be a reduction in total nicotine in the smoke without a reduction in the physiological satisfaction associated with nicotine”36 (Figure 2 ▶).
The Industry’s Rationale for Freebasing. Liggett and Myers in 1971 explained the rationale behind the company’s experiments to increase the proportion of “freebase” nicotine as part of its multiyear “Project TE-5001.”
Source. Reference 36.
THE ORIGINS AND SPREAD OF AMMONIA TECHNOLOGY
Long before the widespread use of freebasing, tobacco industry scientists knew that nicotine deliveries were sensitive to pH manipulation (by adding acids or bases). Several documents from the 1930s and 1940s discuss how to reduce the amount of free nicotine in tobacco by adding an organic acid, which would combine with the free nicotine base to form a (bound) nicotine salt.37 Free (vs “combined”) nicotine in those early years was often characterized as “toxic,”38 which made sense at a time prior to the push to reduce tar and nicotine in the “filter wars” and “tar derby” of the 1950s and 1960s. Many other industry documents from this earlier period describe the well-known art of denicotinization, which often used a base (such as ammonia) and steam to remove the offending alkaloid from tobacco. Denicotinization involves some of the same processes as freebasing, although the desired outcomes are different. Denicotinization involves the application of gaseous ammonia so that, upon addition of steam, the nicotine can be removed; freebasing impregnates tobacco with a salt (such as DAP) so that ammonia is released when the cigarette is lit, making nicotine more available to the smoker.
Tobacco chemists knew enough to freebase nicotine as early as the 1930s and 1940s,39 but there was little reason then to manipulate cigarettes in this manner. Smoking was not yet widely accepted as a cause of lung and heart disease,40 and most people still smoked cigarettes yielding very high levels of tar and nicotine. Only beginning with the “health scare” of the 1950s, and with increasing urgency in the 1960s and 1970s, did Philip Morris and the other manufacturers scramble to appease a rattled public by marketing cigarettes with lower levels of tar and nicotine, which is where the value of ammoniation came in.
It is difficult to say whether Philip Morris scientists expected diammonium phosphate to increase the availability of free nicotine in its new version of Marlboro, introduced in the mid-1950s. After all, the compound was largely being used as a pectin releaser and flavorant in reconstituted tobacco. Philip Morris chemists were, however, experts in pH manipulation, as were chemists more generally. Freebasing was not an unknown phenomenon, but there was not yet a practical need for it in the cigarette business.
In 1962, a Philip Morris study found diammonium phosphate products delivering 0.57 mg of nicotine per cigarette versus 0.44 mg in untreated tobaccos.41 Keenly aware of the increasing demand for cigarettes low in nicotine,42 Philip Morris later used its patented DAP-BL process to give its “low-yield” Merit brand an edge over its competitors. Merit cigarettes boasted a total nicotine yield (measured by Federal Trade Commission machines) only half of that found in Marlboros, but still managed to make available the same amount of free nicotine to smokers (about 0.33 mg in both instances). Brown and Williamson scientists reflected on this in 1980, commenting that “in theory a person smoking these cigarettes [Merit and Marlboro] would not find an appreciable difference in the physiological satisfaction from either based on the amount of free nicotine delivered.”43
This was not the first time Brown and Williamson had pondered the value of freebasing. Its parent company, British American Tobacco, in the mid-1960s had recognized along with Philip Morris that the “strength” or “impact” of a cigarette was related not to the total nicotine content of the smoke but rather to the amount of “extractable” or “free” nicotine, which varied significantly with smoke pH.44 Brown and Williamson in 1971 had given the code name UKELON to urea, an ammonia source that the company recognized as “a way of achieving normal impact from low tar cigarettes.”45 The same company’s “Project LTS” (low “tar” satisfaction) acknowledged that free (un-protonated) nicotine was “more readily absorbed and thus has a decidedly satisfying effect on the smokers’ taste receptors.” The goal of LTS was a cigarette containing “greater levels of ‘free’ nicotine” in “an enhanced alkaline environment.”46 By 1980, the company had concluded that “we have sufficient expertise available to ‘build’ a lowered mg tar cigarette which will deliver as much ‘free nicotine’ as a Marlboro, Winston or Kent without increasing the total nicotine delivery above that of a ‘Light’ product.”47
Apart from DAP-BL recon, Philip Morris experimented with other kinds of ammonia technology. As early as 1957, for example, the company came up with the economically unfeasible “New Idea No. 46”48 to “soak stems in liquid ammonia,” imparting to them greater “protein-like” material and “those properties now being produced by the aqueous NaOH, by virtue of its basic nature.”49 The ammonia was difficult to recycle, however, and the idea was quickly abandoned. A 1966 progress report on “nicotine and smoke pH” discussed the results of adding ammonium carbonate and oxalic acid to tobacco and concluded that nicotine deliveries could be “controlled via filler or smoke pH adjustment.”50 Throughout this time, from the mid-1960s through the 1970s and 1980s, the company kept a close eye on the pH levels of its major brands.51
THE STAMPEDE TO KEEP UP WITH THE MARLBORO MAN
Although some historians maintain that Philip Morris’s rise to the top of the tobacco industry in the mid-1970s was because of its ingenious Marlboro ad campaign, featuring a ruggedly handsome cowboy in the beautiful and equally rugged West52—“Marlboro Country”—the makers of competitor brands could justifiably disagree. In the 1960s, with Philip Morris brands streaking ahead of the pack, RJ Reynolds, American Tobacco, Lorillard, Liggett, and Brown and Williamson all began investigations into what would later be called “the secret”53 and eventually “the soul” of Marlboro.54 All discovered the virtues of freebasing, but this didn’t happen overnight.
Brown and Williamson and its parent, British American Tobacco, were apparently the first (after Philip Morris) to realize the importance of ammonia in increasing nicotine availability, but American Tobacco55 and the other companies were not far behind. RJ Reynolds incorporated ammoniated sheet into Camel filters in 1974, allowing them to deliver 36 mg of ammonia per cigarette in the mainstream smoke.56 Five years later, the company began using ammoniated sheet in its popular Winston brand.57 Teague, in a 1973 report marked “secret,” noted that Marlboro, in comparison with RJ Reynolds’s own Winston, showed
1) higher smoke pH (higher alkalinity), hence increased amounts of “free” nicotine in smoke, and higher immediate nicotine “kick”, 2) less mouth irritation, less stemmy taste and less Turkish and flue-cured flavor, and 4) [sic] increased burley flavor and character.58
Teague then went on to point out that cigarettes with rising sales, especially Philip Morris brands, all showed evidence of pH manipulation. Another RJ Reynolds document from 1973 (aimed at targeting the youth market) stated that “for public relations reasons it would be impossible to go back all the way to the 1955 type cigarettes”—high in tar and nicotine—but took comfort from the fact that “still, with an old style filter, any desired additional nicotine ‘kick’ could be easily obtained through pH regulation.”59
Sometime during the 1980s, Lorillard caught up with Philip Morris and began using ammonia technology in its own cigarettes, by which time British American Tobacco had initiated Project AMTECH to investigate “the potential benefits of ammonia technology.”60 By the end of the 1980s, five of the “big six” of the industry (all but Liggett, which had researched but apparently never commercialized a freebase concept using calcium hydroxide)61 were using a total of 10 million pounds of ammonia per annum, amounting to about 10 mg per cigarette. RJ Reynolds alone released 900 000 pounds of ammonia in 1989 from its factory in North Carolina.62
British American Tobacco and Brown and Williamson held the first of several ammonia technology conferences in the spring of 1989 to enhance “rapid commercial application” of ammonia technologies and to provide a forum to discuss “research strategies and priorities.” Here we find an acknowledgment that ammonia technology was “the key to competing in smoke quality with [Philip Morris] worldwide”63; we also find a discussion of the different ways ammonia was being used to achieve the freebasing effect. Philip Morris was using DAP recon and urea; RJ Reynolds was using ammonia gas; American and Lorillard were using DAP recon; and Brown and Williamson itself was using DAP recon and urea, code-named QUELAR and UKELON.64 At the second Annual Ammonia Technology Conference one year later, the opening statement affirmed that “ammonia technologies have been developed in the group to the stage where US blended products can be manufactured with comparable smoking quality to Marlboro.”65 A Brown and Williamson strategy document from 1991 concluded that ammonia technology was “the key factor” and “critical to the taste, character and delivery of Marlboro.”66
Of course, the joy felt by Brown and Williamson and the other tobacco companies after uncovering “the secret of Malrboro” was matched by disappointment at Philip Morris, which had enjoyed this advantage over its competitors for years. William A. Farone, director of Applied Research at Philip Morris from 1976 to 1984, recalls that “when Winston started increasing their level of ammonia we had, you know—the roof fall down on us from [corporate headquarters in] New York City.”67
THE OUTSIDE WORLD LEARNS THE TRUTH
Philip Morris’s use of ammonia to freebase nicotine remained essentially a company secret until the 1970s and an industry secret until the 1990s. With access to documents produced in litigation, however, groups outside the industry began to catch on. Alix M. Freedman broke the story in a Pulitzer Prize–winning article for the Wall Street Journal in 1995,68 based partly on documents unearthed through Commissioner David Kessler’s investigations at the FDA. In 1996, in its regulations restricting the sale and distribution of cigarettes, the FDA noted that “compounds in free or unbound forms are vaporized more readily than compounds bound together in salts,” giving both nicotine and cocaine as examples. The FDA went on to note that cigarette manufacturers had provided no evidence to rebut charges that “the conversion of nicotine from its bound form to its free form increases the transfer of nicotine to smoke.”69 One year later, James F. Pankow published a paper describing how ammonia increased nicotine volatility and availability in cigarette smoke, comparing this to the “immediate and intense high” produced by the freebasing involved in the making of crack cocaine.70
The industry’s response was quick and characteristically dismissive. In 1998, Philip Morris lawyers deposed Pankow, questioning not just the details of his experimental design but also his professional ethics.71 The company also criticized his assertion of a similarity between the tobacco industry’s use of ammonia and the freebasing of cocaine.72 Philip Morris lawyers also used the 1979 surgeon general’s report to help them debunk the charge of freebasing. According to this report, produced under Surgeon General Julius B. Richmond, “the percentage of nicotine present as the free base is .40 at pH 5.35, 1.7 at pH 6, 15 at pH 7, 64 at pH 8, and 85 at pH 8.6.”73 Philip Morris maintained that because its cigarettes had a pH of about 6, nearly 99% of its nicotine was in the form of a protonated salt. So whatever effect ammonia might be having on the percentage of freebase nicotine, and thus the rate of nicotine “delivery,” would be trivial.
From experiments performed by other companies, however, we know that even very slight increases in pH can have a significant effect on the availability of freebase nicotine in smoke. Recall Brown and Williamson’s 1980s demonstration that Merit cigarettes had only half the total nicotine of Marlboro cigarettes while still delivering the same amount of free nicotine, thanks to only a 0.5 increase in pH. The companies were also aware that pH provides only an imperfect estimate of free nicotine availability.74 Wayne, Connolly, and Henningfield have reviewed the industry’s internal documents on freebasing and shown that free nicotine levels of Philip Morris’s and other companies’ cigarettes were significantly higher than those predicted from pH values alone.
Company officials also argued that while ammonia might well increase the rate of nicotine delivery, the same total amount of nicotine was delivered nonetheless. Rate of nicotine delivery, though, is a key aspect of addiction. That is one reason nicotine gums and patches usually cannot deliver the same “satisfaction” as smoking: lung deliveries are far more intense, and freebasing only heightens this effect. A 1994 draft report on experiments conducted at Philip Morris’s secret research center (INBIFO) in Cologne, Germany, conceded that when subjects inhaled the same amount of nicotine at different pH levels, those who inhaled at higher alkalinity experienced faster rates of entry of nicotine into the bloodstream.75
DISGUISING THE USE OF AMMONIA AS A FREEBASING AGENT
In their attempts to defend against charges of freebasing, Philip Morris and the other companies took advantage of ammonia’s innocuous uses to draw attention away from its freebasing ability. Tobacco executives argued: how could ammonia, a natural compound found in tobacco, food, fertilizer, pesticides, and many other everyday products, have this secret ability to control nicotine levels? In a 1994 Tobacco Institute response to FDA Commissioner David Kessler we find such arguments, along with the claim that ammonia’s most important use was in reconstituted tobacco, “so the blended leaf sticks together.”76 This same document suggests that the idea of the FDA regulating tobacco was ludicrous, making no more sense than the FDA regulating coffee or beer. (Philip Morris has since reversed course and now argues in favor of FDA regulation, hoping this regulation will help preserve its position as the nation’s number one cigarette maker.)
There are many other industry pronouncements from the 1990s that attempt to draw attention away from ammonia’s freebasing function. A 1994 Brown and Williamson document (prepared for use in public relations or litigation) points out that ammonia and its many derivatives are found in everyday foods: ammonium bicarbonate in baked goods; ammonium hydroxide in cured pork; diammonium phosphate in dough, ice cream, and gelatin; and ammonium sulfide in baked goods and meats. And ammonia itself is found in human breath.77 An RJ Reynolds document insists that the industry’s uses of ammonia “are similar to many of the applications commonly used in the food industry.”78
Philip Morris has also tried to exonerate ammonia by emphasizing its roles as a flavorant and pectin-releaser.79 In Iron Workers v. Philip Morris, Harold G. Burnley Jr, the company’s former vice president of operations, was asked, “Is it true that Philip Morris uses ammonia for the purpose of increasing a nicotine kick?” He answered, “No, sir . . . it was used really initially in BL [blended leaf] to hold the sheet together, and it was used as a flavorant in RL [reconstituted leaf].”80 In 1997, Philip Morris lawyers interrogated their company’s former director of applied research about his claim that ammonia was used to increase nicotine availability, asking, in so many words: how do you know it’s not just a flavor thing?81 Pankow was questioned along similar lines in Washington v. American Tobacco Co, with lawyers for the defense asking how he could be sure that the increase in nicotine delivery was from the ammonia added and not the ammonia already present in the tobacco.82 Similar rationalizations were put forward at the industry’s second Annual Ammonia Technology Conference, where we hear that ammonia simply “enhances processes that occur naturally during tobacco and cigarette aging and during combustion.”83
Philip Morris and the other tobacco companies also split chemical hairs by denying they had ever used gaseous ammonia to achieve any kind of freebasing effect.84 A small truth here hides a larger deception, because it is true that the freebasing effect is not ordinarily achieved by using ammonia in gaseous form. The more usual practice is to use nitrogen-containing compounds such as proteins and amino acids (e.g., lysine) and ammonium salts such as DAP and ammonium tartrate, carbonate, and citrate along with ammonium hydroxide and urea, all of which readily transform into ammonia upon the addition of heat (as when a cigarette is lit). Tobacco manufacturers have also freebased using weakly basic substances that, when heated, convert into more-alkaline compounds (sodium carbonate produces sodium oxide, for example, which turns into sodium hydroxide in the presence of water).85 Philip Morris in 1994 claimed that even if it had been adding ammonia (in a volatile gaseous form) to cigarettes the compound would simply evaporate away, reducing the pH to its normal level before the cigarette was even shipped.86 That, however, is why most companies use nonvolatile ammonium salts such as DAP as their freebasing reagents: ammonium salts break down into ammonia, increasing the pH of the tobacco and deprotonating the nicotine in the process, but only after the cigarette has been lit.
CRACK NICOTINE?
In the mid-1990s, FDA Commissioner Kessler was using the tobacco companies’ recently discovered manipulation of nicotine to argue for the regulation of tobacco.87 The industry knew that any admission of using ammonia to increase the availability of nicotine would be an admission that nicotine is the addictive sine qua non of smoking, and tobacco manufacturers did not want to have cigarettes compared to crack cocaine. (According to Farone, the industry made a conscious effort in the 1980s and 1990s to avoid the term freebasing in any documents or statements because it didn’t want to be associated with cocaine.88) With so much at stake, it is not surprising that the industry attempted to cover up its use of ammonia as a freebasing reagent.
It is important to keep in mind that the ammonia cover-up is only one of dozens of similar cover-ups, part of the industry’s calculated disregard for human health.89 The industry has tried to efface the truth in depositions and even in internal documents, but the facts are clear: Philip Morris by the early 1960s had realized ammonia’s ability to augment the potency of nicotine and then used this knowledge to develop cigarettes that were nominally low in tar and nicotine while still having a powerful nicotine kick. Sales of Philip Morris products skyrocketed as a result, spiking the company to the top of the market charts. And the other manufacturers took notice: RJ Reynolds, American Tobacco, Brown and Williamson, Liggett, and Lorillard all worked hard to figure out Marlboro’s secret and by the 1970s and 1980s had developed their own versions of ammonia technology, which all but Liggett implemented commercially.
It should also be noted that freebasing represented a reversal of a decades-old effort to make cigarettes “milder.” The first major US cigarette brand, Camel, introduced in 1913, succeeded on the basis of its use of a flavored blend of oriental, burley, and flue-cured Virginia tobaccos, producing a milder and more inhalable smoke than previous generations of tobacco products. Flue-cured “bright” tobacco blends were less alkaline and therefore easier to inhale than traditional varieties, notably those used in the pipe and cigar trade, where tobaccos were typically high in pH (circa 8) but generally too harsh to inhale. Cigarette makers modified the chemistry of tobacco throughout the 1930s and 1940s, seeking to produce an ever-milder smoke that could be inhaled without stimulating coughing. When demand for lower-tar and lower-nicotine cigarettes arose in the 1950s and 1960s, however, the industry realized there were limits to how low nicotine levels could go without “weaning”90 smokers from their habit. Cigarette manufacturers worried about producing an “emasculated”91 cigarette devoid of flavor and missing the grip of addiction. Freebasing solved a big part of this problem, because tar and nicotine levels could now be lowered—up to a point—without the risk of losing customers. Teague at Reynolds in 1973 summarized the achievement: “As a result of its higher smoke pH, the current Marlboro, despite a two-thirds reduction in smoke ‘tar’ and nicotine over the years, calculates to have essentially the same amount of ‘free’ nicotine in its smoke as did the early WINSTON.”92
It is not yet clear to what extent manufacturers in other parts of the world—for example, China and Japan—use ammonia in the manufacture of their cigarettes; this topic deserves further study. Diammonium phosphate is not legal for use in cigarettes in Austria, Germany, or Spain:93 does this mean that freebasing is achieved by other means? Nicotine yields of American cigarettes have risen steadily over the past few years94: could this mean a retreat from the practice of ammoniation in favor of other methods of nicotine manipulation?
What is not in doubt is that the continued pull of nicotine has generated a global epidemic of lung and heart disease. Tobacco has become the world’s single largest preventable cause of premature death, accounting for about 5 million fatalities per annum, a number expected to grow to about 10 million per year over the next couple of decades. There is also tragedy, though, in the fact that so many scholars have helped to perfect and enhance this terrible technology of mortality. Tens of billions of dollars have been spent by the industry on tobacco chemistry96 in the decades since British and American scientists followed the Germans in proving that smoking could cause lung cancer and heart disease.97 Cigarettes are among the most carefully (and craftily) designed small objects on the planet, but they also cause more death and disease than any other invention since humans first learned how to spark fire from stone and metal. We should not be so surprised that the industry has manipulated cigarette chemistry to keep people smoking; what is surprising, though, is how easily they have gotten away with it.
Acknowledgments
T. Stevenson presented an early version of this article in R.N.P.’s “Tobacco and Health in World History” class at Stanford University, Stanford, CA. R.N. Proctor has worked as an expert witness in litigation against the tobacco industry.
The authors would like to thank Jan Logemann and Peder Roberts for help locating certain documents.
Notes
Peer Reviewed
Contributors
R.N. Proctor suggested the topic, and T. Stevenson did most of the research and writing.
ENDNOTES
Product type | Cigarette |
---|---|
Owner | Philip Morris USA in the U.S., Philip Morris International outside of the U.S. |
Produced by | Philip Morris USA in the U.S., Philip Morris International outside of the U.S. |
Country | United States |
Introduced | 1920; 99 years ago |
Markets | See Markets |
Tagline | 'Mild As May', 'Come to where the flavor is. Come to Marlboro country', 'You get a lot to like with a Marlboro' |
Marlboro (US: /ˈmɑːrlˌbʌroʊ/,[1][2]UK: /ˈmɑːrlbərə, ˈmɔːl-/)[3] is an American brand of cigarettes, currently owned and manufactured by Philip Morris USA (a branch of Altria) within the United States, and by Philip Morris International (now separate from Altria) outside the United States. Richmond, Virginia, is the location of the largest Marlboro cigarette manufacturing plant. Marlboro is the global best-selling cigarette brand since 1972.[4] As of 2017, Marlboro had 40% market share in the United States, more than the next 7 competing brands combined.[5]
- 3Sport sponsorship
- 4Products
History[edit]
Philip Morris opened a New York subsidiary in 1902 to sell many of its cigarette brands. The mark 'Marlboro' was registered in the United States in 1908 although no cigarette was marketed under this name until 1923. In 1924, the brand was launched. They are first marketed as 'America's luxury cigarette' and were mainly sold in hotels and resorts.[6]
Around the 1930s, it was starting to be advertised as a women's cigarette, based on the slogan 'Mild As May'. The name was taken from a street in London where Philip Morris's British factory was located.[7] However, as early as 1885, a brand called 'Marlborough' was already being marketed as a 'ladies' favorite' by Philip Morris & Co.[8]
In the 1930s, advertising for the cigarette was primarily based on how ladylike the filter cigarette was, in an attempt to appeal to the mass market.[9] To this end, the filter had a printed red band around it to hide lipstick stains, calling it 'Beauty Tips to Keep the Paper from Your Lips'.[10]
Shortly before World War II, the brand's sales stagnated at less than 1% of tobacco sales in the US and was briefly withdrawn from the market. After the war, Camel, Lucky Strike, and Chesterfield were the only common cigarettes.
After scientists published a major study linking smoking to lung cancer in the 1950s, Philip Morris repositioned Marlboro as a men's cigarette in order to fit a market niche of men who were concerned about lung cancer. At the time, filtered cigarettes were considered safer than unfiltered cigarettes, but had been until that time only marketed to women. Men at the time indicated that while they would consider switching to a filtered cigarette, they were concerned about being seen smoking a cigarette marketed to women.[10]
The red and white package was designed by the designer Frank Gianninoto. The emblem is placed on top of the pack and has the popular Latin expression Veni, vidi, vici ('I came; I saw; I conquered'), authored by Julius Caesar. The repositioning of Marlboro as a men's cigarette was handled by Chicago advertiser Leo Burnett. The proposed campaign was to present a lineup of manly figures: sea captains, weightlifters, war correspondents, construction workers, etc. The cowboy was to have been the first in this series. While Philip Morris was concerned about the campaign, they eventually gave the green light.[10]
Marlboro's market share rose from less than one percent to the fourth best-selling brand. This convinced Philip Morris to drop the lineup of manly figures and stick with the cowboy,[10] later known as the Marlboro Man. From 1963, the television advertisements used Elmer Bernstein's theme from The Magnificent Seven.
In the late 1960s, Marlboro 'Longhorn 100's' were introduced. Although colour-coded with gold, they were full flavor cigarettes, not lights.[11] In 1972, Marlboro became the best-selling brand of tobacco in the world.[12][13]
In order to comply with a 2006 court ruling in United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., et al.,[14] Philip Morris (and all other cigarette companies) is now prevented from using words such as 'Lights', 'Ultra-Lights', 'Medium', 'Mild', or any similar designation that yields a false impression that they are safer than regular full flavour cigarettes. Thus Marlboro and other cigarette companies must use only color-coding instead; for example, Marlboro Lights are now called Marlboro Gold Pack.
Philip Morris responded to the popularity of Pall Mall, the number three brand, by pushing Marlboro Special Blends, a lower-priced cigarette.[15]
In 2013, Philip Morris International introduced 'Marlboro 2.0'. The pack design was changed; the dark red was replaced with a lighter red, the 'Marlboro' and Philip Morris logo became ribbed and transparent, and around 2017 a special 'SmartSEAL' was introduced to keep the stored cigarettes fresh for a longer period of time.[4][16] The Marlboro 2.0 packs are mainly available in Europe and some parts of Africa, Asia and Latin America, but not in the United States, Canada, Australia (due to plain packaging), and New Zealand.
In 2015, Philip Morris announced they would introduce a 'Firm Filter' to their Marlboro Red, Gold, Silver Blue, Ice Blast and White Menthol variants. Philip Morris managing director for the United Kingdom and Ireland, Martin Inkster, said that the Firm Filter technique was added to 'offer quality you can feel, and it is a cleaner way to stub out your cigarette'.[17]
Advertising[edit]
In the 1920s, advertising for the cigarette was primarily based on how ladylike the filter cigarette was, in an attempt to appeal to the mass market.[9] To this end, the filter had a printed red band around it to hide lipstick stains, calling it 'Beauty Tips to Keep the Paper from Your Lips'.[10]
The red and white package was designed by the designer Frank Gianninoto. The repositioning of Marlboro as a men's cigarette was handled by Chicago advertiser Leo Burnett. The proposed campaign was to present a lineup of manly figures: sea captains, weightlifters, war correspondents, construction workers, etc. The cowboy was to have been the first in this series. While Philip Morris was concerned about the campaign, they eventually gave the green light.[10]
Marlboro's market share rose from less than one percent to the fourth best-selling brand. This convinced Philip Morris to drop the lineup of manly figures and stick with the cowboy,[10] later known as the Marlboro Man. From 1963, the television advertisements used Elmer Bernstein's theme from The Magnificent Seven.
Over the years, Philip Morris has made many billboard, poster and magazine adverts.[18][19][20]
Philip Morris also made various sports-related billboards, stickers and other memorabilia throughout the years, mainly promoting the Marlboro brand via its McLaren and Ferrari teams partnerships in places like Russia and Monaco.[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]
Through licensees, Philip Morris sells various merchandising products, such as lighters, ashtrays, sunglasses and other accessories, which are sometimes given away to the target group as part of promotional promotions. In 1983, the campaign 'Marlboro Adventure Team Adventure Camp' was launched, for which the participants had to apply, there was a collection of clothing and accessories.
Sport sponsorship[edit]
Formula One[edit]
Marlboro is well known for its association with motor racing. This started in 1972 with the sponsorship of Formula One team BRM, who took one win at the 1972 Monaco Grand Prix. In 1973 and 1974, the cigarette giant backed Frank Williams Racing Cars team, whose cars were registered as Iso-Marlboro.
In 1974, Marlboro became famously associated with the McLaren team, which brought it its first Constructors' Championship and its drivers title for Emerson Fittipaldi. The team was successful through to 1978, with another world champion in James Hunt in 1976. Following that, the partnership went through a dry patch until Ron Dennis's Project Four Organization took over the team in 1981. Marlboro-sponsored McLaren dominated F1 for much of the 1980s and early 1990s, with Niki Lauda, Alain Prost and Ayrton Senna between them winning the Drivers' Championship all but one year from 1984 to 1991. After the departure in 1993 of Ayrton Senna, who died in an accident the following year, Marlboro McLaren did not win a race for three years. Marlboro ended their sponsorship of the team in 1996, which ended the famous red and white McLaren livery. After the end of the 1996 season, McLaren was sponsored by West from 1997 onwards.
Over the years, McLaren had to alter the Marlboro livery to comply with regional anti-tobacco sponsorship laws which were in place in countries like France, the United Kingdom and later Germany. The Marlboro logo was replaced by a chevron in 1974, with a barcode in 1984 and 1985 and from 1987 to 1992 or with 'McLaren' in 1986 and from 1991 to 1993 and 1994 to 1996. At the 1986 Portuguese Grand Prix, Keke Rosberg's car was painted yellow and white rather than red and white, to advertise Marlboro Lights.
Marlboro also sponsored Scuderia Ferrari's drivers since 1973 (the brand appeared only on helmets and suits) but only in 1984 became a minor sponsor on Ferrari's single-seaters. Until then, Enzo Ferrari allowed only technical suppliers brands to appear on his team cars. In 1993, Marlboro began to take over as the primary sponsor, and in 1997 became title sponsor as the team was officially named 'Scuderia Ferrari Marlboro'.
Over the years, Ferrari, just like McLaren, had to alter the Marlboro livery in various ways to comply with regional anti-tobacco sponsoring laws which were in place in countries like France, the United Kingdom and later Germany. The Marlboro logo was removed completely or replaced with a white space from 2000 to 2004 (The Ferrari cars had white spaces over Marlboro occasionally in 1998 and 1999), changed to a 'bar code' from 1994 to 1999 and in 2005 and 2006, or the text was removed while keeping the chevron with the driver's name (1993) and in the team member clothing, the Marlboro logo became a white square with a red stripe above with the driver's written name from the 1980s until 1996. The team used a special livery for the 2001 Italian Grand Prix in remembrance of the September 11 attacks in the United States; both cars ran without any sponsorship livery and sported matte black nose-cones. In the 2005 Bahrain Grand Prix the cars sported black nosecones as a sign of mourning for Pope John Paul II.
Full List Of Marlboro Cigarettes
In September 2005, Ferrari signed an extension of their sponsorship arrangement with Marlboro until 2011. This agreement came at a time when tobacco sponsorship had become wholly illegal in the European Union, and other major F1 teams ended their relationships with tobacco companies. In reporting the deal, F1 Racing magazine judged it to be a 'black day' for the sport, putting non-tobacco funded teams at a disadvantage and discouraging other brands from entering a sport still associated with tobacco. The magazine estimated that in the period between 2005 and 2011, Ferrari received $1 billion from the agreement. Depending on the venue of races and the particular national laws, the Marlboro branding became largely subliminal in most countries.
In mid-2006, special 'racing editions' of Marlboro Red were sold in the UK, with a Ferrari-inspired design, although the Ferrari name and badge were not used. In April 2008, Marlboro displayed explicit on-car branding on Ferrari for the last time, then permanently replaced with a variety of barcodes in place of it. Since then, there were calls from leading health officials, the European Commissioner for Health and influential doctors for a review of the subliminal advertising contract Marlboro has with Advertising Guerrilla and Ferrari, due to the implications of influencing the purchase of cigarettes with possible subliminal advertising, as no tobacco products can be promoted in sporting events in Europe by law.[31] The Ferrari team claimed the barcode was part of the car design, not an advertising message.[32]
The controversial barcode design was removed by Ferrari for the start of the Spanish Grand Prix in the 2010 season, but the barcode remained on drivers' team gear.[33] In January 2011, the Scuderia Ferrari presented a new logo for its racing team. This logo is considered by a specialised F1-website[34] as a subliminal advertisement for Marlboro, evocating the top-left corner design of a Marlboro cigarettes pack.
In June 2011, Ferrari extended its collaboration with Marlboro through to the end of 2015, despite cigarette advertising being banned in the sport.[35] The deal has been subsequently renewed for three more years, through 2018.[36] In February 2018, Philip Morris renewed their partnership deal with Ferrari until the end of 2021. While the logo, which has been in place since 2011, has been removed on this year's car, it is speculated that Ferrari will put Philip Morris' non-tobacco brand iQOS instead, bypassing currently in-place laws that prohibit specific advertising of tobacco products.[37][38][39][40]
Marlboro had provided financial support to many racing drivers, the most illustrious of whom are Alain Prost, Ayrton Senna and Mika Häkkinen. From 1970 until the mid-1990s, the logos of the cigaretiers could be present on the combinations of the drivers if they were not present on the cars. Marlboro has also sponsored many grand prix races up until 2005.[41][42][43]
Marlboro also sponsored a multitude of other, smaller teams in Formula One. It was the main sponsor of Alfa Romeo F1 Team between 1980 and 1983, although unable to match up to its pre-war and 1950s heyday, the team only achieving one pole position, one fastest lap and four podium finishes. In 1984 the Italian clothing brand Benetton took over Alfa Romeo's livery sponsorship, which they held until the withdrawal of Alfa Romeo from Formula One at the end of 1985. The Marlboro logo was replaced with a barcode at certain races, due to tobacco or alcohol sponsorship bans in place.
Marlboro Cigarettes Types And Pictures
Marlboro sponsored the BMS Scuderia Italia team from 1988 until 1992, when Chesterfield became their main sponsor. The livery was very similar to the Ferrari and Alfa Romeo ones. The Marlboro logo was displayed on the front and side of the cars and on the drivers helmets. In some races where explicit tobacco sponsoring was forbidden, the Marlboro logo was removed.[44][45][46][47]
Marlboro sponsored the Arrows F1 (by the time known as 'Footwork') team in 1994. While Ruffles, a potato chips brand sponsored the car, Marlboro sponsored the drivers helmets.[48][49]
Marlboro sponsored the EuroBrun team in 1988. The ER188, driven by Oscar Larrauri, Stefano Modena and Gregor Foitek, featured the Marlboro logo on the helmets of the drivers, as well as the Marlboro logo and name on the side of the cars.[50][51]
Marlboro sponsored the Fittipaldi Automotive team in 1981. The Marlboro logo was displayed on the helmets of the drivers.[52][53]
Marlboro sponsored the Forti F1 team in 1995 and 1996. The logo was displayed on the top side of the car, as well as on the helmets of the drivers.[54][55][56]
Marlboro sponsored the Merzario team from 1977 until the team's collapse in 1979. The Marlboro logo's were displayed on the front, side and on the drivers helmets.[57][58][59]
Marlboro sponsored the Minardi team in 1995. The Marlboro logo was displayed on the front and side of the cars and on the drivers helmets. In some races where explicit tobacco sponsoring was forbidden, the Marlboro logo was replaced with a barcode.[60][61]
Marlboro sponsored the Onyx Grand Prix team in 1989 and 1990. The Marlboro logo was displayed on the front and side of the cars and on the drivers helmets. In some races where explicit tobacco sponsoring was forbidden, the Marlboro logo was replaced with a barcode, but the Chevron logo was retained.[62][63]
Marlboro sponsored Team Rebaque in 1979. The Marlboro logo was displayed on the front and side of the cars and on the drivers helmets. In some races where explicit tobacco sponsoring was forbidden, the Marlboro logo was removed.[64][65][66][67]
Marlboro sponsored the Rial Racing team in 1988 and 1989. The Marlboro logo was displayed on the front and side of the cars and on the drivers helmets. In some races where explicit tobacco sponsoring was forbidden, the Marlboro logo was replaced with a barcode.[68][69][70]
Marlboro sponsored the Spirit Racing team in 1983 and 1984. The Marlboro logo was displayed on the front and side of the cars and on the drivers helmets.[71][72]
GP2[edit]
From 2005 to 2007, GP2 Series team ART Grand Prix was sponsored by Marlboro. The Marlboro logo's were prominently shown on the car in the 2005 and 2006 seasons, but in 2007 the team only sponsored the brand on the rear wing.[73][74][75] In countries where the sponsoring of tobacco was forbidden, the Marlboro logos were replaced with a barcode.[76]
Grand Prix motorcycle racing[edit]
Marlboro entered the Grand Prix motorcycle racing in the seventies as personal sponsor of riders like Giacomo Agostini, Angel Nieto and Jarno Saarinen. In 1976, Marlboro backed Agostini's team, who raced MV Agusta bikes with little factory support.
Since 1983, the cigarette brand sponsored the Yamaha 500 cc works team, which was managed by Agostini until 1989 and then by Kenny Roberts until 1996. During that period, the Japanese bikes won six World Championships and, as a result of their sponsorship, Marlboro decals on race replica bikes became one of the most popular decal kits that were available.
In the 1990s, Marlboro's livery also appeared on other bikes, especially the Hondas entered by Team Pileri (from 1992 to 1995), Pons Racing (in 1993)[77] and Erv Kanemoto's team (in 1997 and 1998) who achieved the 1997 250 cc World Championship with Max Biaggi.
The Yamaha works team was again associated with Marlboro between 1999 and 2002.
Marlboro sponsored the Ducati CorseMotoGP team from 2003. Casey Stoner took his first MotoGP title in 2007. As of the 2009 Grand Prix motorcycle racing season they were only allowed to brand the bikes at one round, in Qatar at the Losail International Circuit, using the barcode in other races. The controversial barcode design was then removed by Ducati for the start of the French motorcycle Grand Prix in the 2010 season. In January 2011 the Ducati Team presented a new logo which was regarded as a subliminal advertisement for Marlboro, evocating the top-left corner design of a Marlboro cigarettes pack, similar to the one used by Ferrari.
In January 2018, it was speculated that Ducati would carry sponsorship by Philip Morris' non-tobacco brand iQOS instead, bypassing currently in-place laws that prohibit specific advertising of tobacco products.[78]
Superbike World Championship[edit]
Marlboro sponsored the Yamaha Dealer Team from its inaugural season in 1988 to 1990.[79][80][81][82]
CART/IndyCar[edit]
Marlboro sponsorship in IndyCar dates back to 1986 when the livery appeared on the Emerson Fittipaldi's car entered by Patrick Racing. In 1990Penske Racing hired Fittipaldi and started a 20 years-long association with Marlboro and its distinctive red and white livery. However, in the 2007 season Marlboro logos were replaced with 'Team Penske' but the team retained the color scheme as Philip Morris USA was still Penske's main sponsor.2009 was the last year of the Penske-Marlboro association.[83]
24 Hours of Le Mans[edit]
Since their start in Formula One, Marlboro has also sponsored numerous teams and races, from Joest Racing in Group C in 1983 to Toyota at the 24 Hours of Le Mans in 1999 (despite a tobacco ban in France).
Masters of Formula 3[edit]
Marlboro sponsored the Marlboro MastersFormula Three race in Zandvoort.
World Rally Championship[edit]
Marlboro has a long history in rallying sponsorship, including the factory World Rally Championship teams of Lancia (between 1972 and 1974), Mitsubishi (from 1999 to 2002), and Peugeot (from 2003 to 2005). The cigarette brand appeared on helmets and suits of some of the best rally drivers, being personal sponsor of Markku Alén, Timo Salonen, Juha Kankkunen, Miki Biasion and others.Between 1987 and 1992, Marlboro backed Carlos Sainz, appearing on his cars (Ford Sierra in 1987–88 and then Toyota Celica since 1989). In 1993 the cigarette brand started an association with Belgian rally driver Freddy Loix, who was racing for Opel in the Belgian rally championship. Between 1996 and 1998 Loix raced with Toyota Team Belgium in the WRC, carrying the Marlboro livery on his car. In 1999 he moved to Mitsubishi Ralliart works team, with the iconic livery remaining on successive Lancer Evolutions until the marque's temporary WRC withdrawal at the end of 2002.
Marlboro also sponsored the cars of Emirati rally driver Mohammed bin Sulayem[84] and has sponsored a number of rallies including the Safari Rally (between 1982 and 1990), the Rally Argentina, the Rally of Lebanon,[85] the Jordan Rally,[86] and the UAE Desert Challenge.[87]
Australian touring car racing[edit]
Marlboro also sponsored the Holden Dealer Team from 1974 through to 1984. The Marlboro branding gave rise to some of Australia's most prominently recognizable lauda cars such as the L34 and A9X Torana, as well as the famous VK Group C 'Big Banger' Commodore of Peter Brock and Larry Perkins Bathurst winning fame.
IMSA SportsCar[edit]
Marlboro sponsored the Italo-AmericanIMSA SportsCar Le Mans GT team Risi Competizione since 2004 but Risi Competizione opting to invisible the Marlboro logo due to the team respecting Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement regulations and also ban of cigarette advertising in sports.
Badminton[edit]
Marlboro sponsored the Thomas and Uber Cup from 1984 to 1990, as well as the Sudirman Cup from 1991 to 1995 and 2001 to 2013.[88][89][90][91]
Products[edit]
Phillip Morris markets cigarettes,[92]snus,[92] and Heatsticks under the Marlboro brand.[93]
International cigarette varieties[edit]
Philip Morris International organized Marlboro products into three divisions – Flavor line, which are original red/full flavor cigarettes, Gold line are former lights and Fresh line comprises flavored cigarettes.[94][95][96][97][98]
Marlboro in Canada[edit]
Philip Morris sold the Canadian rights to the 'Marlboro' name to Imperial Tobacco Canada in 1932. After the brand's successful American relaunch in the 1950s – which later became well known to Canadians through exposure to the brand's international sponsorships and advertising – Philip Morris tried several legal manoeuvres in attempting to reacquire the Canadian rights, to no avail. Imperial Tobacco continues to sell a line of cigarettes under the Marlboro name in Canada, albeit with very different packaging from that of the Philip Morris product. Philip Morris retains the rights to the 'rooftop' trade dress and other elements of Marlboro's branding which were developed after the 1932 sale, and has historically used that trade dress in Canada in combination with the names 'Matador' or occasionally 'Maverick' for a line of Virginia blend cigarettes.[99][100]
In 2006, Philip Morris International's Canadian affiliate Rothmans, Benson & Hedges introduced a new product with the 'rooftop' trade dress, and marked as being the 'World Famous Imported Blend', but not bearing any actual brand name. This led to a legal challenge from Imperial, contending that the new packaging created customer confusion by merely suggesting the Marlboro brand, thereby infringing on Imperial's Canadian trademark rights. Canada's Federal Court of Appeal ruled in favour of Imperial in June 2012. The judgment noted that Canadian regulations which (in most cases) prohibit the public display of tobacco products at retail locations – i.e., customers must ask for a brand by name – exacerbated the situation, as there were now two products that customers might be referring to when asking for 'Marlboro'.[99] Though PMI is expected to appeal, shortly after the ruling it began using the brand name 'Rooftop' on packaging for the previously unbranded cigarettes.[100]
See also[edit]
References[edit]
- ^After Bans, Tobacco Tries Direct Marketing (audio on page)
- ^'Marlborough'. Oxford Dictionaries. Oxford University Press. Retrieved January 10, 2019.
- ^John Wells (2010-01-06). 'John Wells's phonetic blog: Marlborough'. Phonetic-blog.blogspot.com. Retrieved 2011-08-03.
- ^ ab'Building Leading Brands'. www.pmi.com.
- ^CDCTobaccoFree (2018-08-01). 'Tobacco Brand Preferences'. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved 2019-05-21.
- ^'Marlboro cigarettes - name origin of the brand - High Names agency'. 11 January 2013.
- ^'snopes.com: Marlboro and the KKK'. snopes.com. 27 April 2011. Retrieved 19 June 2015.
- ^'History of Philip Morris'. sourcewatch.org. 1987. Retrieved 24 November 2015.
- ^ abHolt, Douglas; Cameron, Douglas (2010). Cultural Strategy. Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-958740-7.
- ^ abcdefgErin Barrett and Jack Mingo, ed. (2003). W.C. Privy's Original Bathroom Companion. St. Martin's Press. pp. 407–410. ISBN0-312-28750-X.
- ^'Vintage Tobacco/ Cigarette Ads of the 1960s (Page 26)'. Vintageadbrowser.com. Retrieved 2017-06-04.
- ^'The Marlboro Man'.
- ^'The Marlboro Man Still Sells Cigarettes'.
- ^United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., et al., 449 F.Supp.2d 1 (Dist. Court, Dist. of Columbia 2006).
- ^Craver, Richard (2012-09-26). 'Reynolds to offer more menthol versions of Pall Mall cigarettes'. Winston-Salem Journal.
- ^'reklamehimmel: Abschied von gestern: Markennamen sind auch nicht mehr das, was sie mal waren'. reklamehimmel.typepad.com.
- ^'Philip Morris reveals new look for Marlboro'. 29 January 2015.
- ^'Stanford Research into the Impact of Tobacco Advertising'. tobacco.stanford.edu.
- ^'Marlboro cigarette ads'. www.vintageadsandstuff.com.
- ^'Marlboro Stockfoto's en -beelden - Getty Images'. www.gettyimages.nl.
- ^'Belarus: Minsk Outdoor Advertising: 20/07/2005 / Marlboro Red Racing School in Minsk, Belarus'. www.data.minsk.by.
- ^'Ferrari extends deal with tobacco company Philip Morris'.
- ^F1Writers™. 'Vettel and Marlboro ads around Monaco pic.twitter.com/slnmOCTLhm #F1 #MonacoGp #Vettel'.
- ^'Marlboro F1 World Championship Team Stickers'. RetroGP.
- ^'Original marlboro jean alesi oreca f3000 team 1988 period race sticker adesivo'. Pinterest.
- ^'Vettel, imagen de un anuncio de Marlboro en Mónaco'. 23 May 2015.
- ^'Marlboro cigarette advertising in Monaco at Monaco GP'. Motorsport.com.
- ^'Marlboro cigarette advertising in Monaco at Monaco GP'. Motorsport.com.
- ^'Marlboro advertising Formula One F1 sponsor Car Postcard'. www.hippostcard.com.
- ^'Book Formula 1 race car driver Niki Lauda, Marlboro Autocourse. - Catawiki'. Catawiki.
- ^'Eurosport Yahoo News, April 29, 2010'. Uk.eurosport.yahoo.com. Retrieved 2011-08-03.
- ^Jagger,Suzy; Watson, Rory, 'Ferrari F1 barcode a 'smokescreen for cigarette adverts', The Times (London), April 29, 2010
- ^'Ferrari removes bar code design from car'. USA Today. May 7, 2010.
- ^'Le nouveau logo de Ferrari propice à polémique?'. Toilef1.com. January 28, 2011. Retrieved 2011-08-03.
- ^'Ferrari extends deal with tobacco company Philip Morris, June 16, 2011'. En.espnf1.com. 2011-06-14. Retrieved 2011-08-03.
- ^Duff, Alex (13 May 2015). 'Philip Morris can't kick 20-year Ferrari Formula One habit'. Bloomberg L.P. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
- ^'Philip Morris extend Ferrari sponsorship deal - PlanetF1 : PlanetF1'. www.planetf1.com.
- ^'Ferrari sluit nieuwe meerjarige deal met Marlboro'.
- ^'Marlboro will be advertised on the 2018 Ferrari car'. 21 February 2018.
- ^'Ferrari change their logo'. 2 January 2018.
- ^Mitchell, Malcolm. '1995 Formula 1 Programmes - The Motor Racing Programme Covers Project'. progcovers.com.
- ^Mitchell, Malcolm. '1998 Formula 1 Programmes - The Motor Racing Programme Covers Project'. progcovers.com.
- ^Mitchell, Malcolm. '2005 Formula 1 Programmes - The Motor Racing Programme Covers Project'. progcovers.com.
- ^'Under a misleading 'ex-Alesi' Ferrari F93A F1 livery, in fact a hybrid: Lola BMS Scuderia Italia Ferrari T93-30 at Modena Trackdays'. Motorsport.com.
- ^re. 'italiaspeed.com'. www.italiaspeed.com.
- ^'bms scuderia italia - Tumblr'.
- ^'J J Lehto BMS Scuderia Italia Dallara Judd 192 F1. 1992 British GP Silverstone. - a photo on Flickriver'. www.flickriver.com.
- ^'Footwork Arrows FA15 Formula 1 Car'. 12 July 2017.
- ^Cardoso, Danilo. 'A história da Arrows F1 Team - Equipes Históricas da F1 - Super Danilo F1'. www.superdanilof1page.com.br.
- ^'F1 Teams of the Past – Eurobrun Racing'. 28 January 2013.
- ^'EuroBrun Racing'. Pinterest.
- ^'Fórmula 1 del ayer'. Pinterest.
- ^'1981 British Grand Prix'.
- ^'F1 Teams of the Past – Forti Corse'. 12 January 2013.
- ^F1, STATS. 'Forti FG01-95 • STATS F1'. www.statsf1.com.
- ^'F1: Former F1 team owner Guido Forti passes away - Auto123.com'. www.auto123.com.
- ^'F1 - Merzario: un cavaliere del rischio di nome Arturo - Storia - Motorsport'. 11 March 2016.
- ^'1978 Formuła 1'. Pinterest.
- ^'Arturo Merzario (South Africa 1978)'. DeviantArt.
- ^'F1 - Pierluigi Martini: le grandi imprese con la Minardi - Storia - Motorsport'. 16 December 2011.
- ^'Livery Histories #5: Minardi'. 19 January 2015.
- ^'Flickriver: Onyx Grand Prix Cars pool'. www.flickriver.com.
- ^'Onyx Grand Prix - Formula Fan'. formula-fan.ru.
- ^'Formula 1'. Pinterest.
- ^'F1 - Prywatne zespoły'. Pinterest.
- ^'F1 - Il Gotha dei piloti 'con la valigia' - Storia - Motorsport'. 16 December 2015.
- ^'8W - Who & What? - (Hector) Rebaque'. 8w.forix.com.
- ^'Rial Racing Rial Arc2 Ford Cosworth Dfr Stock Photos and Pictures - Getty Images'. www.gettyimages.fi.
- ^'Rial Racing T Shirt'. RetroGP.
- ^'rial racing - Tumblr'.
- ^'Spirit 201C, Honda V6, GP Europe 1983 - Sudio27 1:20'. Modeler Site.
- ^'Racing - 1983'. Stefan Johansson Växjö.
- ^'Nico Rosberg - ART Grand Prix'. www.art-grandprix.com.
- ^Magazine, Speedsport. 'Michael Aleshin - ART Grand Prix: GP2 Series 2007 - Photo 2/38'. www.speedsport-magazine.com.
- ^'Lucas Di Grassi - ART Grand Prix'. www.art-grandprix.com.
- ^Magazine, Speedsport. 'Alexandre Premat - ART Grand Prix: GP2 Series 2006 - Photo 1/28'. www.speedsport-magazine.com.
- ^'History'. Pons Racing. Archived from the original on 22 March 2012. Retrieved 24 November 2012.
- ^Nugnes, Franco. 'Ducati could run e-cig branding in 2018 MotoGP season'.
- ^'World Superbike entry list for 1988'. Motorcycle Racing Online.
- ^'World Superbike entry list for 1989'. Motorcycle Racing Online.
- ^'World Superbike entry list for 1990'. Motorcycle Racing Online.
- ^'Peter Goddard - Photos'. www.petergoddard.com.
- ^'Penske loses Philip Morris sponsorship'. Autoweek. Crain Communications. 23 February 2010. Retrieved 21 November 2014.
- ^'Turkey: Middle East Champion Mohammed bin Sulayem Drives to Victory in Bosphorous Rally'. ITN Source. 18 May 1991. Retrieved 21 December 2014.
- ^'All systems go for weekend's Marlboro car rally'. dailystar.com.lb. 30 June 2001. Retrieved 21 December 2014.
- ^'Bin Sulayem adds another feather to his cap'. gulfnews.com. 29 September 2002. Retrieved 21 December 2014.
- ^Sharp, Martin (5 December 2009). 'The supercar sheik … who enjoys a drive in the country'. telegraph.co.uk. Retrieved 21 December 2014.
- ^'1982 Thomas Cup Final'. mynahbird20000.blogspot.nl.
- ^'1949 Thomas Cup'. mynahbird20000.blogspot.nl.
- ^'1984 Thomas Cup Final pt 1'. mynahbird20000.blogspot.nl.
- ^'THOMAS CUP UBER CUP SPONSERED BY MARLBORO 1984 on Carousell'. carousell.com.line feed character in
|title=
at position 11 (help) - ^ ab'Marlboro.com – Official Website for Marlboro Cigarettes'.
- ^Felberbaum, Michael (June 26, 2014). 'Philip Morris Int'l to Sell Marlboro HeatSticks'. Richmond, Virginia: ABC News. AP. Retrieved June 28, 2014.
- ^'Brand Architecture Marlboro'. MARLBORO BRAND ASSET MANAGEMENT.
- ^'Product architecture – Flavor line, Gold line, Fresh line (Image)'. annetonia.files.wordpress.com. October 2012. Retrieved 2017-06-04.
- ^'Philip Morris' Marlboro Brand Architecture'.
- ^'2011 Annual Report'.
- ^'PMI.com Our Brands'.
- ^ abGauthier, Johanne (2012-06-29). 'Marlboro Canada Limited v. Philip Morris Products S.A. (2012 FCA 201)'. Federal Court of Appeal (Canada). Retrieved 2012-09-15.
- ^ abKrashinsky, Susan (2012-08-03). 'Why Marlboro Country ends at the border'. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved 2012-09-15.
External links[edit]
- Media related to Marlboro (cigarettes) at Wikimedia Commons